Tom Danielson's new book - Core Strength for Cycling's Winning Edge
Submitted by Kris Thompson on
According to Tom's new book, "Core Strength for Cycling's Winning Edge" tells the story of how Danielson was able to use strength training techniques to be a better racer.
Want more, maybe a book and an autograph
Autographing and Lookout Mountain Group Ride
Tom Danielson and Allison Westfahl
Saturday, December 22 from 9:30 a.m. to 11:00 a.m.
Prestige Imports
9201 W. Colfax Ave.
Lakewood, CO 80215
29 Comments
Look past it if you don't like the name or lack of name
Submitted by 303admin on
If you only respect those comments made by people with names than don't read the ones posted by anonymous and certainly don't reply back to them... if Mr/Mrs Anonymous provided no value than replying to it does not add to the conversation.
Kris
Points: 0
My post dealt with Jeff's
Submitted by still Not Jeff (not verified) on
My post dealt with Jeff's implication that lots of folks are hitting inhalers or cutting the cones on TTs or otherwise cheating, and therefore it's not a big deal that these guys doped. Not everyone cheats.
Points: 0
Tom is a doper, but he doesn't suck?
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on
Wow! Not all dopers suck? So Tom is a decent guy? Dopers are decent? OK, whatever you say.
Points: 0
All dopers suck. Dopers that
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on
All dopers suck. Dopers that serve less than 2 years of a ban suck more
Points: 0
How about this:
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on
Doping is cheating and cheating is wrong. However it is ridiculous to mindlessly lump every doping offense and offender into one equivalent group of irredeemable "suck."
Points: 0
Droopy Dog
Submitted by Jamie Morgan (not verified) on
"Cheaters Never Prosper" Droopy Dog
Points: 0
All dopers suck....period.
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on
He's out schmoozing and selling his book while he is serving a measly 6 month ban? If he donates the proceeds from the book to BikePure.org or some worthy anti-doping cause, I might change my view of him. Until then he SUCKS just like Lance and all the rest. As far as I am concerned, we don't need these people in the sport anyway. There are plenty of clean up and coming riders Like Taylor Phinney and TJ VanG that we can look up to and rebuild the sport from there. Lets concentrate on the young clean riders. Can you honestly say any of the dopers from the past would add anything of value to the competition? While you watch them, you know they cheated in the past, so how can you ever trust them again? I would just as soon see, TJ, Taylor, Froom and Wiggins, riders that I know are clean, duking it out on the slopes of Alpe D'Huez. The entertainment is just as exciting. It's time to cut out the cancer and heal the sport.
Points: 0
Deep Thoughts
Submitted by Jack Handey (not verified) on
Integrity is like virginity, once you lose it you can't get it back.
Tom D lost his (integrity, that is) and he can't get it back, can't buy it back, no matter how many kiddie rides he leads. He cheated and can't ever be trusted. He's proven he has no integrity nor strength of character.
Points: 0
You know what else "sucks"....
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on
Talking to people who refuse to consider nuance, motivation, remorse or contribution to the sport. It's comfortable and easy to compartmentalize things when you only have a good and bad category.
Also how do you know these other riders are clean? I have no idea whether they are or not, but if I've learned anything from the USADA bust this year, it is that neither youth, vocal condemnation of doping, nor outgoing personality is indicative of ethical riding.
Points: 0
"Talking to people who refuse
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on
"Talking to people who refuse to consider nuance, motivation, remorse or contribution to the sport."
You forgot responsibility; oh wait, Lance made them do it. Looks like they forgot personal responsibility also.
Points: 0
Pages