Stazio returned last weekend
Submitted by Kris Thompson on
The Frostbite TT might be the season opener but is usually the first big event for the majority of riders and spectators. This year the race will be managed by the CU Cycling team and the course is out by the Stazio ball fields. Having raced there many times this course is a tough opener for most given the amount of climbing on each lap but on the flip side "usually" this race is safe-ish for that very same reason.
More on the Stazio Criterium from the Daily Camera
Results
Photos

Leader in Men's A field. DU rider looked very strong!
Men's A field had an early break by 4 of the above riders and through most of the race the DU rider appeared to have a demanding control of the break. Near the end of the race the DU rider road the coat tails of the other 3 riders making them do the work and play their own games out. In the back CU have the field locked down.
Photo Credit:David Kuticpal
But this time, the criterium at Stazio supports the University of Colorado's cycling team.
“Each school in the conference has to put on one race -- it's mandatory,” said Kris Schoech, of CU's Club Sports. (Cycling is a club sport at CU.) But, he said: “It's expensive to put on a race.”
In the past, the team put on its race at the CU Research Park, Schoech said. “We used to have it around the Qwest building, but then Qwest got different management.” So the team sought out a permit from the city for a race on the loop that includes Stazio Drive and 63rd Street.
The move is costing the team. In total, the race at Stazio has burned through about $4,000 of the team's funds, Scheoch said, which means they're starting their fundraising to help the team go to regionals and nationals -- nationals alone will cost the team $7,500 to $10,000.


36 Comments
Would be nice to hear some
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on
Would be nice to hear some communication from BRAC on the matter...
Points: 0
Reply
Submitted by JayZ (not verified) on
simple relationship....racers PAY to participate...organizers and sanctioning body collect payments....timing and results should be rock solid (ummm look at how triathlons have done it for 10+ years)
don't make rationalizations about organizers: collect race fees then meet expectations....sanctioning body: permit an event then make it meet standards; racers: not satisfied then don't return next year and let the market (supply/demand) auto correct
Points: 0
except they do come back. a
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on
except they do come back. a promoter takes on a huge amount of risk putting on a march race. but if you get good weather, racers will show up. everyone thinks they're a superstar this time of year. come july, when then weather's always perfect, we'll be getting 30 people showing up in each category.
Points: 0
Shhhh. You're messing up my
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on
Shhhh. You're messing up my summer-point-whoring-for-the-upgrade strategy.
Points: 0
"LIKE"
Submitted by Jon (not verified) on
"LIKE"
Points: 0
Results are up.
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on
Results are up.
http://www.coloradocycling.org/results/road#year=2012&eventId=1059&resul...
Points: 1
Results are incomplete at
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on
Results are incomplete at best.
Points: 1
Hey if you don't get top 20
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on
Hey if you don't get top 20 in the 3/4 race, you don't get a result!!!!!
Points: 0
See if you can figure out the analogy
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=grxL5umOE6g
Points: 0
I approve this message.
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on
I approve this message.
Points: 0
Pages