I know it's early in this USADA poll, but I find it fascinating that the previous poll asking if we want more bare bones racing versus more expensive productions, it was 3:1 for simple, cheap races in a field somewhere with minimal extras (timing chips, vendors, prizes etc).
Now in this poll, it looks like we're leaning 3:1 toward 'yes' testing Colorado racers is a good idea.
Is it just sample size and different people voting on different polls? Or do we collectively want a $20 race in a field with no timing chips and no prizes, but the winner of the Cat 3 race might need to go pee in a cup?
2 Comments
Observation on 2 polls
Submitted by Andy Harmon (not verified) on
I know it's early in this USADA poll, but I find it fascinating that the previous poll asking if we want more bare bones racing versus more expensive productions, it was 3:1 for simple, cheap races in a field somewhere with minimal extras (timing chips, vendors, prizes etc).
Now in this poll, it looks like we're leaning 3:1 toward 'yes' testing Colorado racers is a good idea.
Is it just sample size and different people voting on different polls? Or do we collectively want a $20 race in a field with no timing chips and no prizes, but the winner of the Cat 3 race might need to go pee in a cup?
Opinions?...
Points: 3
All races should be fair regardless of size
Submitted by Rick James (not verified) on
I agree with the results of both polls and I believe that a race regardless of it's size/fame/prize list should be fair.
Points: -3