Recent comments

  • Reply to: 2013 - Superior Morgul Classic   23 min 22 sec ago

    This was my personal experience, but I found there to be a big jump between Cat 5 and Cat 4. Definitely would have been too-much-too-soon if I'd gone straight into Cat 4.

  • Reply to: 2013 - Superior Morgul Classic   26 min 20 sec ago

    What I mean is: if a promoter combines cup categories, then it would have to be scored separately. Also, the "Cup points" are a lame excuse to ram specific race categories down promoter's throats. Having 3 Cat 4 fields every race does not necessarily make sense.

  • Reply to: 2013 - Superior Morgul Classic   1 hour 1 min ago

    Raced Superior Morgul and Boulder RR several times. Maybe I'm fitter this year!

    The full course was pretty effective at dropping riders, for a supposedly easier race.

  • Reply to: 2013 - Superior Morgul Classic   1 hour 59 min ago

    Age is not a good determination of ability.
    Why not just do 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 in a day? Would still need to split out 3s, 4s, and 5s into age groups because of field size at some large races.

  • Reply to: 2013 - Superior Morgul Classic   2 hours 51 sec ago

    Pre-USAC we didn't have to run cat 5s. This was the reason we needed three cat. 4 fields. Races used to have 75+ in each. With the cat. 5 USAC crap this added one or two more cats per day. See 20 minute Cat. 5 crits...
    Go back away from USAC so we can define what makes since with Colorado Demographics. We also have a bunch of "sandbaggers" in the 5s because of the One-Day only in 5s rule.

  • Reply to: 2013 - Superior Morgul Classic   2 hours 18 min ago

    "BRAC define the Cup categories and let the promoters do whatever makes sense for them on race day"

    You can't have a defined CUP Policy then have someone change it at the last minute. What would be the point of having a structured series and show to a race and it be something else.

    The is CUP policy for all the read on http://www.coloradocycling.org/.

    Races, registration, flyers are planned more than 30 days in advance.

  • Reply to: 2013 - Superior Morgul Classic   3 hours 4 min ago

    I don't think BRAC needs to solve the problem; let BRAC define the Cup categories and let the promoters do whatever makes sense for them on race day.

    That could mean having Men 4 A and Men 4 B, or it could mean Men 4 and Master's Men 4. If a promoter historically doesn't have too many Cat 4s, he doesn't have to do anything.

    Different promoters will come up with different solutions. If you have a short course with lots of turnarounds, you might choose to run fewer categories. If you're running a hill climb, you might only need to run 4 categories.

    If we let the promoters be efficient, the entry fees might even go down.

  • Reply to: 2013 - Superior Morgul Classic   3 hours 17 min ago
    4s

    Any big race has two many fours for one field. The obvious way to handle that is to have a masters 4 field. Right now we have three cat 4 fields, and that does seem one more than we need.

    Except for Boulder Roubaix and a couple cross races, I don't think there are ever too many 3s for a single field.

  • Reply to: 2013 - Superior Morgul Classic   3 hours 36 min ago

    I don't quite understand why we need Master's categories that are limited by category. If you're a 41-year-old Cat 3, either race 40+ or Senior Men 3.

    Master's A (40+ Open)
    Master's B (50+ Open)
    Men P12
    Men 3
    Men 4
    Men 5
    Women P12
    Women 3
    Women 4

    Also, I would allow combined fields at the PROMOTER'S DISCRETION so long as the results are split out for Cup purposes. So Men 3/4 or Men 4/5 or Men P123 would all be good, just publish it in your flyer.

    This year the Gila made the mistake of introducing a Master's B field, which instead of adding registrants just resulted in smaller Master's A and Men's 3 fields.

    Just for reference, here are the categories from a pretty big summer road race on the east coast: P12, 3, 4, 5, 40+, 50+, Women P123, Women 3/4.